The Journal of Chiropractic Education2000 Spr; 14(1): 55
ABSTRACT: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system afflicting over 250,000 persons in the United States alone. While the etiology of MS is currently unknown, much clinical evidence points to an infectious process involving an unknown agent, causing an immune response against one’s own nervous system in genetically susceptible persons. The resulting inflammation of the central nervous system tissues produces a wide variability in the clinical sense, with subtypes of MS ranging from remitting-relapsing varieties to a chronic progressive expression of MS. No cure exists for MS, and as a result most therapies are directed toward the alleviation of MS-related symptomatology while promoting self-sufficiency. The medical approach toward MS symptom relief generally includes a vast array of pharmaceutical agents, diet modification, physical therapy, and addressing associated psychological issues. Alternatives to these treatment modalities have increasingly become available, most with little more than anecdotal support. Described is a prospective case series involving chiropractic care with four MS patients, each diagnosed with the chronic progressive form of the disease. The purpose of this series was to investigate any significant relationship between chiropractic care delivery and MS-related symptomatology.
METHODS: Four patients were selected from a local MS support group, each with a diagnosis of chronic progressive MS (confirmed by imaging). A clinical trial of 6 months duration was undertaken, utilizing two separate and distinct methods of chiropractic care: Three of the patients were treated over the course of 6 months utilizing full-spine chiropractic manipulative therapy, while the fourth was treated using only Toggle recoil upper cervical technique. Subjective and objective parameters were measured initially, and every 4 weeks until the completion of the 6 month trial. These outcome measures included the SF-36 Health Survey, as well as the MS-ADL Scale (Gulick); strict physical examination criteria were also followed at these intervals. Lastly, each patient was encouraged to keep a daily diary in which to record pertinent subjective data.
RESULTS: Data collected over the course of the clinical trial illustreates measurable change in various “quality of life” issues. Data retrieved from SF-36 surveys measured the following: General Health, Physical Functioning, Limitations Due to Physical Health, Limitations Due to Emotional Health, Pain, Energy/Fatigue, and Emotional Well-Being. The MS-ADL Scale (Gulick) measures were considerably more specific, including: Eating, Dressing, Walking, Transfer, Travel, Bathing, Toileting, Recreation/Socializing, Sensory/Communication, and Intimacy. Data collected indicated that change was primarily seen in categories involving physical ability, energy level, and bodily pain; these areas are discussed fully, with a comparison being made between the two treatment groups.
DISCUSSION: Presentations of multiple sclerosis vary greatly, in the clinical sense. Many patients are affected with change in physical ability or general musculoskeletal function as a direct manifestation of the disease. compensation for these deficits is certain. These compensatory efforts may in fact create still more symptoms, negatively influencing the patient’s perception of well-being. When normal spinal motion patterns have been altered, either directly or indirectly, chiropractic manipulative therapy may be indicated. Correction of these spinal aberrations may positively impact the MS patient’s quality of life.
CONCLUSION: This case series has suggested that chiropractic care is a viable, noninvasive form of treatment for musculoskeletal symptoms associated with multiple sclerosis. While promising, the results of this study indicate the need for further research in this area.
© SOTO-USA 2025 - All rights are reserved by SOTO-USA to the electronically printed material herein.
This SOT Literature Page and all its contents herein are published by SOTO-USA solely for the purpose of education. All rights reserved by SOTO-USA to accept, reject or modify any submission for publication. The opinions stated in the electronically printed material herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions of SOTO-USA or other individuals associated with SOTO-USA. SOTO-USA does not guarantee or make any representation that the printed material contained herein is valid, reliable or accurate. SOTO-USA does not assume any responsibility for injury arising from any use or misuse of the printed material herein. The printed material contained herein is assumed to be from reliable sources and there is no implication that the printed material herein present the only, or the best methodologies or procedures for the care or treatment of conditions discussed. It is incumbent upon the reader to verify the accuracy of any diagnosis and treatment information contained herein, and to make modifications as new information and/or research arises.
Vist the wisdom, skill, and humor of Dr. DeJarnette the developer of Sacro Occipital Technique.
Major Bertrand DeJarnette, DC, was a renowned inventor, engineer, osteopath, and chiropractor throughout his long and productive career.