Conference Proceedings of the Chiropractic Centennial1995 Jul: 153-67
Practitioners of spinal manipulation have long been proponents of its effectiveness in the treatment of headaches. Reports to this effect exist in all literature of each of the main branches of manual therapy–chiropractic, osteopathy, manual medicine and physiotherapy. These reports range from anecdotal presentations, theoretical treatises, pathophysiologic and clinical studies to case series, cohort and randomized controlled studies [1,2]. There is a remarkable longevity and consistency to this literature, contributing to a coherent body of opinion and data which supports the role of the cervical spine in the etiology of a significant proportion of what we might call “benign headache”. As well, there is growing evidence for the efficacious role for manual therapeutics in the treatment of these kinds of headaches. Nevertheless, this coherent “manual therapy” paradigm is largely disregarded in orthodox circles, despite the introduction, in 1988, of a “cervicogenic headache” category in the Classification of Headaches of the International Headache Society [3]. This neglect of the “manual therapy model” also continues despite the large body of data which clearly delineates the role of the interconnection of neural pathways in what Bogduk has called the “trigemino-cervical nucleus” in the genesis of head and possibly face pain [4]. It is now indisputable that the afferent connections from the upper cervical joints have an enormous capacity to create referred head and facial pain [5,6,7], as well as muscle dysfunction in the cranio-vertebral region [8]. Manual therapy researchers have consistently reported on signs of cervicogenic dysfunction, including local and referred pain as well as myofascial dysfunction, in the upper cervical region of many sufferers of what has now come to be called “tension-type” and “migraine without aura” headache types [9,10]. This presentation will focus on the evidence which does exist in the literature mentioned above as to the “effectiveness” of spinal manipulation in the treatment of these types of headaches. The reader is referred to other sources on the issues of the cervicogenic basis of headache and the nature of the kinds of dysfunction which chiropractors and others target in their treatment approaches.
© SOTO-USA 2025 - All rights are reserved by SOTO-USA to the electronically printed material herein.
This SOT Literature Page and all its contents herein are published by SOTO-USA solely for the purpose of education. All rights reserved by SOTO-USA to accept, reject or modify any submission for publication. The opinions stated in the electronically printed material herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions of SOTO-USA or other individuals associated with SOTO-USA. SOTO-USA does not guarantee or make any representation that the printed material contained herein is valid, reliable or accurate. SOTO-USA does not assume any responsibility for injury arising from any use or misuse of the printed material herein. The printed material contained herein is assumed to be from reliable sources and there is no implication that the printed material herein present the only, or the best methodologies or procedures for the care or treatment of conditions discussed. It is incumbent upon the reader to verify the accuracy of any diagnosis and treatment information contained herein, and to make modifications as new information and/or research arises.
Vist the wisdom, skill, and humor of Dr. DeJarnette the developer of Sacro Occipital Technique.
Major Bertrand DeJarnette, DC, was a renowned inventor, engineer, osteopath, and chiropractor throughout his long and productive career.