Journal of Chiropractic Case Reports 1993 Jan; 1(1): 1
Objective: To provide a global review of all case reports published chiropractic peer-reviewed journals. To establish a profile of chiropractic research as reflected by single subject studies, identify trends, strengths, weaknesses and future research needs.
Data Sources: A search of the CHIROLARS online chiropractic database was performed. In view of the fact that this database contains all issues from all peer-reviewed chiropractic journals, no other index source was necessary. All case reports are identified in CHIROLARS by the check tag “case report” making it necessary only to combine this term with a specific journal title to retrieve all case reports for that chiropractic peer-reviewed journal. All 14 peer-reviewed chiropractic research journals were included in this review.
Study Selection: All studies that were identified as case reports per the definition established by the National Library of Medicine were included in this study.
Data Synthesis: A total of 318 case reports have been published in chiropractic peer-reviewed journals. Each of these reports were critically reviewed, classified and categorized along several dimensions, e.g. age of patient, type of conditions treated, types of therapeutic intervention employed. The journals themselves were assessed relative to multiple parameters, e.g. number of case reports by journal, number of case reports by year.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates a trend toward an increase in the number of published case reports. However it is clear that, for the second largest health physician group, the total number of case reports is small. Many conditions that have been purported to respond to chiropractic care (e.g. migraine, hypertension, colic, vertigo) are poorly represented or documented in case reports. Finally, many therapeutic interventions used by chiropractors are also not well represented in the published case reports to date. This review identified areas that need to be addressed by future single subject and other forms of chiropractic research.
© SOTO-USA 2025 - All rights are reserved by SOTO-USA to the electronically printed material herein.
This SOT Literature Page and all its contents herein are published by SOTO-USA solely for the purpose of education. All rights reserved by SOTO-USA to accept, reject or modify any submission for publication. The opinions stated in the electronically printed material herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions of SOTO-USA or other individuals associated with SOTO-USA. SOTO-USA does not guarantee or make any representation that the printed material contained herein is valid, reliable or accurate. SOTO-USA does not assume any responsibility for injury arising from any use or misuse of the printed material herein. The printed material contained herein is assumed to be from reliable sources and there is no implication that the printed material herein present the only, or the best methodologies or procedures for the care or treatment of conditions discussed. It is incumbent upon the reader to verify the accuracy of any diagnosis and treatment information contained herein, and to make modifications as new information and/or research arises.
Vist the wisdom, skill, and humor of Dr. DeJarnette the developer of Sacro Occipital Technique.
Major Bertrand DeJarnette, DC, was a renowned inventor, engineer, osteopath, and chiropractor throughout his long and productive career.