Proceedings of the Int’l Conference of Spinal Manipulation1993: 63
Background and Objectives: By convention and tradition, primary those not caused by infectious, neoplastic, or vascular lesions, have been diagnosed as being either a tension type headache or a migraine headache or one of the variants of those two types. There is a mounting body of evidence that rather than existing as discrete pathophysiologic entities, these chronic headaches are better understood as existing on a continuum; at one end of the continuum lies a pure migraine headache and at the other end lies a pure tension headache. Most chronic headaches exhibit clinical qualities of both tension and migraine headaches. Additionally, there is evidence that these headaches share common etiologies. An instrument has been developed that attempts to establish where on this continuum a particular headache lies and the reliability of this instrument will be evaluated. Means of measuring the validity of this instrument will also be discussed.
Methods: Patients meeting the following criteria were accepted into this study: 1. Patient has had headaches for at least one year. 2. Patient has at least four headaches per month or, if fewer than four headaches per month, rates those headaches as severe. 3. Patient is not currently being treated for headaches. Patients meeting these criteria were administered the instrument. They were told only that we were collecting information about headaches. One month later the instrument was re-administered to the patients. They were told that this was a questionnaire similar to the one they filled out before. it was, in fact, the identical questionnaire. Two different sets of patients participated in this study. One group consisted of patients diagnosed as having migraine headaches who were enrolled in a controlled clinical trial comparing chiropractic to medical therapy. The questionnaire was administered before any treatment was initiated. The second group consisted of students who met the criteria and whose headaches were undiagnosed.
Results: Data collection and analysis are ongoing. The results will be evaluated for test-retest reliability and for internal consistency.
Conclusions: By identifying where on the headache continuum a particular headache lies, a clinician can make a more informed decision regarding treatment and prognosis of that patient.
© SOTO-USA 2025 - All rights are reserved by SOTO-USA to the electronically printed material herein.
This SOT Literature Page and all its contents herein are published by SOTO-USA solely for the purpose of education. All rights reserved by SOTO-USA to accept, reject or modify any submission for publication. The opinions stated in the electronically printed material herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions of SOTO-USA or other individuals associated with SOTO-USA. SOTO-USA does not guarantee or make any representation that the printed material contained herein is valid, reliable or accurate. SOTO-USA does not assume any responsibility for injury arising from any use or misuse of the printed material herein. The printed material contained herein is assumed to be from reliable sources and there is no implication that the printed material herein present the only, or the best methodologies or procedures for the care or treatment of conditions discussed. It is incumbent upon the reader to verify the accuracy of any diagnosis and treatment information contained herein, and to make modifications as new information and/or research arises.
Vist the wisdom, skill, and humor of Dr. DeJarnette the developer of Sacro Occipital Technique.
Major Bertrand DeJarnette, DC, was a renowned inventor, engineer, osteopath, and chiropractor throughout his long and productive career.